As Gordon Brown disappears into the dustbin of history as
the man who saved the Union it is appropriate
to take a look at his significance. There is no doubt that he was both the
architect and builder of New Labour’s economic policy which has been so
difficult for Ed Miliband to shake off.
This is probably because he has persisted in dragging the
dead weight of Ed Balls around with him. Balls not only represents the Brown
legacy but offers little hope that Labour has learned anything from those
years.
My own view is that history will be much kinder to Brown the
Prime Minister than to Brown the Chancellor. This is probably the exact
opposite of the popular perception. Brown the Prime Minister may have offered
up a Freudian slip in the Commons when he said he had “saved the world” but to
a large extent he had. When the banks
teetered on the edge of collapse in 2008 he did the right things in saving the
banks and putting up taxes.
It is worth remembering that the economy was returning to
growth before George Osborne put the brakes on with his first emergency budget
and derailed the whole process destroying billions of pounds in lost output.
That is only a small part however of Brown’s record. He was
a slavish supporter as Chancellor of Alan Greenspan who for 18 years was boss
of the US Federal Reserve. The man who finally admitted when the Banks where
collapsing that he had found a flaw in the theory. A flaw that had been obvious to most of us for
years.
Having pursued policies of deregulation and liberalisation Greenspan
had now found "he made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of
organisations, specifically banks and others, were such that they were best
capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms”.
In pursuing the same policies and making London a safe haven for rogue global capital Gordon
Brown turned the City in to the world’s largest tax haven.
One of his daftest ideas and one the establishment continue
to praise him for was making the Bank of England “independent”. One of the
greatest triumphs of the post-war Labour Government was the nationalisation of
the Bank of England. The idea that the policies pursued by the bank can somehow
be de-politicised is fatuous. At this level economics is politics.
What’s more an independent bank for years kept UK interest rates higher than those in mainland
Europe doing untold damage to Britain’s
manufacturing sector. Brown managed to destroy one and half million manufacturing
jobs in the process.
As well as liberating the City and the Financial Services
sector to do its worst his next crime was the way he structured the welfare
state to create a set of subsidies to the private sector. His complex web of in-work
benefits kept workers trapped on low pay and subsidised bad employers. Simultaneously
housing benefit grew as private sector landlords had a field day ratcheting up
rents to milk the subsidy.
What’s more because ordinary people received next to no
benefit from his largesse they did not thank him at the ballot box for this
spending.
There are other examples the way that private sector
provision of care for children and the elderly has fallen in quality and risen
in cost. A week does not go by without some scandal in these private services.
He was truly naive in thinking ownership did not matter and you could use
regulated markets to achieve better services for the public.
Clearly Blair and Brown both had a malign influence in the
Labour Party he was ruthless in rooting out any opposition to his policies and
spent an inordinate amount of time jousting with Blair in placing his cronies
in safe parliamentary constituencies.
It is clear now that the golden years of Brown’s
Chancellorship can now be seen as being funded by fool’s gold. The entry of China into the
world economy reducing the costs of manufactures and ushered in a period of low
inflation and individual spending was funded by a tsunami of debt. Rather than
abolishing “boom and bust” he facilitated it.
No comments:
Post a Comment