The Tories and their Liberal Democrat allies have been
accused of wanting to turn life in Britain back to Victorian times. They
seem to want to get us to know our place, to respect those with wealth and to
be upstanding for the Queen and the Union Jack.
Victorian life is well known to us mainly through the novels
of Charles Dickens. In 1824 Dickens was working for six shillings a week in
Warrens Blacking factory labelling pots of bootblack and the whole of that six
shillings went to cover his board and lodging. His father had been arrested for
a debt of £40 and was sentenced to serve in Marshalsea Prison. On weekends Charles
would visit the family in prison.
In 1824 too London
was besieged by soldiers returning from the Napoleonic Wars to no homes and no
jobs (it was ever thus). The government responded with the Vagrancy Act which
in effect made it an offence to sleep on the streets or to beg.
This week three young men, Paul May, Jason Chan and William
James, all residents of a squat in north London,
where charged under the 1824 Vagrancy Act. Their crime was of a profoundly
Dickensian nature, we all know how obsessed many of Dickens’s characters where with
food, how Pip stole food for Maqwitch or how Oliver Twist wanted more.
Their crime is they stole food from a skip at the rear of an
Iceland
store. According to reports they stole mushrooms, tomatoes, cheese and Mr
Kipling cakes.
Under the Act Persons committing certain offences where to
be deemed as rogues and vagabonds some parts of the original act have been
subsumed in newer legislation but some of it remains on the statute book.
They are charged under this part of the Act “every person
being found in or upon any dwelling house, warehouse, coach-house, stable, or outhouse,
or in any inclosed yard, garden, or area, for any unlawful purpose.”
They face three months in prison. Where presumably they will
at least be fed.
I understand that the police have returned the mushrooms,
tomatoes, cheese and Mr Kipling Cakes now very well past their sell by dates to
Iceland.
Presumably they will put them back into the skip. They can then be collected
with 890,000 tonnes of food waste collected by the London
boroughs each year and added to the 1.6 million tonnes of food waste thrown out
by stores across the UK.
What sort of world have we created where everyday trucks make
rounds of the streets of London and take their
cargo either to be incinerated or shipped up the Thames
on barges to have it dumped in the sea or into landfill. In North
London just 23 % is recycled. Landfill sites already cover 109
square miles of our country and an extra 16 million tonnes of rubbish is being
added each year.
And we prosecute three lads for nicking some out of date
mushrooms!
Of course the apologists for capitalism tell us it may not
be that fair but it is efficient. The free flow of market forces ensures nay it
guarantees the most efficient allocation of the factors of production. Well
this demonstrates that it is neither fair nor efficient.
What is fair about the need for foodbanks? And what kind of
efficiency has farmers across the globe overworking their land depleting the
soil and over using chemical inputs to produce food we then put into landfill
whilst people go hungry?
Sometimes it is good to be reminded of why you are a
socialist and of why the trade union struggle for a fair deal at work, the
co-operators struggle for pure food at fair prices and the political struggle
for working class representation are all part of the same fight.
It reminds me of the words of that great Wobblie Fred
Thompson. In his memoir Fellow Worker he explains why he is both engaged in his
union and in the Socialist Party. He says, “perhaps my attitude towards the IWW
and the Socialist Party would be clearer if I added that if there were a food
co-op store nearby, I would feel I should buy there; if there were a daily
labor paper here, that I should subscribe to it even if I quarrelled with the
editor; if there were labor cultural institutions in which I could participate
and I had the time I would do that too.”
The editor and I may quarrel from time to time but that does
not distract us from the bigger fight to maintain that daily voice for a better
world.
Remember the Vagrancy Act in 1824 did not work it paved the
way for the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 which led to huge expansion of the
workhouse system. It meant that instead of outdoor relief, on the basis it was
unsustainable (have we not heard that one before too), the destitute had to
enter the workhouse.
The National Trust has a workhouse at Southwell in
Nottinghamshire, coincidentally built in 1824. Visitors think they are looking
into the past but if we do not get this dreadful government off our country’s back
it just might be their vision of the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment