I
don’t know if you have seen the Danny Boyle film 127 hours. Even if you haven’t
I am sure you will be familiar with the story. It is the story of the terrible
accident that befell Aron Ralston who when climbing in south-eastern Utah fell
and trapped his arm. Stuck for five and a half days under a dislodged boulder he
was forced to amputate his own right forearm with a sort of blunt Swiss army
knife.
This
may sound melodramatic but this is the way I feel about what has happened to
the Co-operative Bank. I feel like someone has cut off one of my arms.
May
9th 2013 will stay long in the memory for many co-operators. It was
the day of reckoning for the Co-operative Bank. It was the day the great
unravelling began, the day ratings agency Moody
downgraded the Bank's debt rating to "junk" status. It said that that
the bank was vulnerable to potential losses and warned that the bank may need
"external support" if it could not strengthen its balance sheet.
In a massive piece of understatement the
Bank said it was "disappointed" by Moody's decision.
The news preceded the resignation of
chief executive, Barry Tootell, and the collapse of the bid to buy 631 branches
from Lloyds Banking Group.
This unraveling has now ended with the enemy
inside the gates. US Hedge Funds sometimes described as “vulture funds”, Silver
Point Capital and Aurelius Capital Management now have significant stakes in
the Bank. Presumably intending to do to us what they usually do with the distressed
assets of developing economies.
Now
Moody’s ever helpful in these matters say that the Bank will be forced to “take
the axe” to costs. It is worth pointing out that the issues the Bank faces are
not dissimilar to those faced by the rest of the banking sector and that had
the collapse of 2008 not happened we would not know be talking about it. Or if
the ludicrously low interest rate regime had not been in place ever since that
has destroyed the margins in conventional retail banking.
Some
Banks have had to be nationalised all have had to be recapitalised. So the
environment for banking has certainly worsened dramatically. We also know that
some of that crisis in the banking sector has been caused by bankers
themselves. By their ridiculous growth strategies
and reckless lending of their taking on of risks and of products that they
themselves did not understand in a mad greed driven feeding frenzy.
We
had prided ourselves that we where different that the mutual sector or at least
what was left of it had weathered the storm better than the joint stock banks.
We encouraged people who had an ounce of ethics to “switch their money”.
Now
we find according to no less than the ex CEO of the Co-operative Group and even
the current chair that there is a crisis of governance at the Group.
I
think we need to unpack these comments because governance has several elements
to it. Clearly there is the structure of the organisation, is there something
inherent in large scale co-operatives that makes them difficult to govern? Was
there a healthy culture at the Group ie was there an open and respectful
relationship between those who represented the interests of the members and the
professional management? And what where the qualities of the key personnel, the
senior executives of the Group and the Bank and the lay chair of the Bank and
the Co-op Group?
Before
we can answer these questions there is a review underway by Sir Christopher
Kelly, Chair of the Kings Fund and former chair of the Committee for Standards
in Public Life. His job is in looking at the trail of poor decisions that lead
us to this situation “to look at the management structure and culture in which
those decisions were taken; lines of accountability which governed those
decisions; and the processes which led to them” and “To identify lessons which
can be learnt to strengthen The Co-operative Bank and the wider Co‑operative
Group, and the co-operative business model generally.”
Clearly
we should wait until the results of that report which will be available at the
Group AGM next May. In the meantime I am full of praise for the way; despite
the dreadful hand his has been dealt, Euan Sutherland the current CEO of the
Group has handled this situation. There
are nonetheless a few things I think that are now obvious.
Firstly
that we should have no confidence in the advice from Group Chair Len Wardle or
ex-CEO Peter Marks about what to do next. We should have stopped listening to
them a long time ago. And it is inconceivable to me that Len could contemplate
staying in the Chair until May he should have already gone.
Secondly
a “Co-operative Bank” with a minority member’s stake maybe “ethical” in intent but
it is evidently not, in my personal view, a
Co-operative. And if it persists in using the name it should be
asked to desist just as the brand Co-operative Travel which the Group sold to
Thomas Cook has to disappear after a certain period.
Lastly
of course I hope this amputation stops the bleeding and it protects the body of
the Co-operative Group from any further liabilities. It is sobering to remember that none of the
demutualised building societies have survived the transition.
1 comment:
A personal plea, not really a comment... I enjoy reading your stuff on the Co-Op bank and other true co-operatives. Would I be right in thinking that you've written a piece for the Morning Star in which you suggest that Flowers is merely a convenient (and pathetic) smokescreen for the failings of the so-called banking experts employed by the Co-Op who have really led us into this depressing position? If so, do you have a link to it? I can't find it again anywhere...
All the best,
Jamie J
Post a Comment